Be Consistent in Enforcing Anti-Harassment Policies
By
Daphne Pierre Bishop, J.D., AWI-CH, Partner & Chair
of the Internal Investigations Practice Group at CDF
Labor Law LLP
Although
it has been more than three years since the #metoo movement
received
widespread recognition, a recent survey of entertainment
industry professionals suggests that employers still
have a lot of work to do. In early 2020, The
Hollywood Commission, which was formed to address
the problems that led to the #metoo movement, conducted
a
survey of nearly 10,000 entertainment industry professionals
about sexual harassment, discrimination, and bullying
in the industry. While 69% of survey respondents
reported
seeing improvements in efforts to prevent harassment
since the #metoo movement went mainstream, harassment
remains a persistent problem: more than 60% of female
and male respondents reported experiencing gender harassment
and more than 40% of female respondents reported experiencing
unwanted sexual attention during the last 12 months.
This article discusses some of the policies, practices,
and procedures employers can implement to further reduce
the prevalence of workplace harassment.
Improve
Harassment
Reporting Infrastructure
According
to The Hollywood Commission survey, only 28% of respondents
who allegedly experienced sexual harassment reported
it to their employers. Underreporting of harassment
can be due, in part, to a lack of process that makes
employees feel safe reporting harassment.
All
employers should have written anti-harassment policies.
These policies should instruct employees on how to report
harassment and give employees
multiple ways to report harassment. In states like California,
applicable laws state employers cannot simply instruct
employers to report alleged harassment to their direct
supervisors. After all, supervisors may be the alleged
perpetrators of harassment. As such, anti-harassment
policies should inform employees that they can report
concerns to individuals outside their direct reporting
chain, such as Human Resources, the legal department,
or an ombudsman. It is strongly recommended that employers
use hotlines, electronic reporting software, or other
methods that allow employees to make anonymous complaints.
Indeed, more than 90% of The Hollywood Commission survey
respondents favored having anonymous tip lines for reporting
harassment.
All
employees should be trained on and reminded about the
employer’s anti-harassment policies at regular
intervals – not only at the beginning of employment
or during an annual training session. Company leadership
should be trained and re-trained about their obligation
to escalate reports about harassment to human resources
or upper management. Leaders should be expected to model
by example as they set the tone for the company’s
culture. This means senior leadership should conduct
themselves appropriately, attend anti-harassment trainings,
have an open door policy, email staff to periodically
remind them about these policies, periodically
discuss anti-harassment policies in staff meetings,
and invite employees to share concerns. Moreover, leadership
should address potential issues as they arise. For instance,
a manager who sees an employee behaving inappropriately
should intervene directly or by enlisting human resources.
Take
Concerns about Retaliation Seriously
In
The Hollywood Commission study, victims of alleged
harassment reported feeling afraid about retaliation
resulting from harassment complaints, including concerns
about impacts on their careers, that they would be
labeled as “difficult to work with,” and
that their concerns would not be taken seriously.
These concerns appear justified, as 41% of respondents
reported that they experienced some type of retaliatory
conduct. To minimize the risks of retaliation against
employees who raise concerns about harassment:
-
Anti-harassment
policies should include strong anti-retaliation
provisions. Employees
should be trained and re-trained on
the company’s anti-retaliation
policies at regular intervals.
-
When
a complaint is made, all parties should
be reminded about the anti-retaliation
policy.
Harassment complaints should be kept
as confidential as possible under the
circumstances.
-
Employees
who are interviewed as part of an
investigation of a harassment complaint
should be advised to keep information
relating the investigation confidential
from their colleagues to reduce gossip
and protect the integrity of the investigation.
At the same time, beware of promising
complete confidentiality to witnesses
during an investigation, as employers
cannot guarantee that all information
disclosed during an investigation
will remain confidential.
-
Keep
alleged victims and their
harassers separate during
the pendency of an investigation
of alleged harassment, which
means taking efforts such
as placing alleged harassers
on leave, allowing alleged
victims to work from home,
moving the alleged harasser
to a different department.
-
Investigate
allegations of retaliation
and discipline employees
who are found to have
violated the anti-retaliation
policy accordingly.
|
Be
Consistent in Enforcing Anti-harassment
Policies.
Most
of The Hollywood Commission’s study respondents
(65%) reported a belief that powerful individuals,
such as producers and directors, would not be held
accountable for harassing less powerful individuals.
This perception is not too surprising, as the most
visible powerful
individuals who have been held accountable for sexual
misconduct during the #metoo era have been those
with multitudes of alleged less powerful victims,
such as Harvey Weinstein, Roger Ailes and Bill Cosby.
Even
the strongest anti-harassment policies and practices
will not work if they are not applied consistently
– including to the most powerful individuals
in an organization. It is especially important to
nip bad behavior in the bud when it comes from high-powered
individuals because they set the tone at a company,
and their bad behavior trickles down through the
ranks. For example, if a high-powered individual
uses crude language about women in the workplace,
they are implicitly allowing others to follow their
lead.
Consistently
enforcing anti-harassment and retaliation policies
requires meting out the same discipline to above-
and below-the-line employees. Human Resources should
be empowered to make disciplinary recommendations
about employees who are found to have violated anti-harassment
and retaliation policies, and management should
seriously consider those recommendations in as transparent
a fashion as possible. The organization’s
governing body, such as the Board of Directors,
should be made aware of allegations against high-level
individuals and be prepared to make difficult decisions
if those allegations are substantiated. While it
may be a difficult decision to separate from a powerful
individual, it sends a message to the company that
harassment will not be not tolerated even by leadership
and ultimately behooves the company in improved
worker morale and reduced negative press and liability
exposure.
In
sum, although some progress has been made in protecting
employees from sexual harassment, there are still
improvements to be made in the areas of reporting
harassment, avoiding retaliation, and consistently
enforcing anti-harassment and retaliation policies.
Daphne
Pierre Bishop,
J.D., AWI-CH, is a Partner & Chair of the Internal
Investigations Practice Group at CDF
Labor Law LLP,
a California-based labor and employment law firm.
Daphne has represented companies with California
workforces for nearly two decades. Her experience
advising and defending small to Fortune 500 companies
in all industries against the gamut of employment-related
claims offers her a unique advantage in assisting
companies prevent, investigate and resolve employee
and institutional misconduct. Her practice focuses
on providing internal investigation services as
a neutral third-party investigator or a strategic
advisor. She can be reached at dbishop@cdflaborlaw.com
or (213) 612-6300.
|
|
|